<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Refactoring Sexy&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onemanswalk.com/work/2010/07/23/making-refactoring-sexy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onemanswalk.com/work/2010/07/23/making-refactoring-sexy/</link>
	<description>jeremy lightsmith on agile, ruby, and consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ville Oikarinen</title>
		<link>http://onemanswalk.com/work/2010/07/23/making-refactoring-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Ville Oikarinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemanswalk.com/work/?p=220#comment-178</guid>
		<description>You should just keep on doing what you do, preferably pairing with your colleagues. If none of them will eventually get it, then the problem is not the &quot;how&quot; you are showing them, it&#039;s the &quot;what&quot;, and there is nothing that can be done to help them.

The first level are the &quot;trivial&quot; refactorings that simply save (a lot of) keystrokes. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s difficult for them to appreciate them. But when someone sees a simple refactoring create an opportunity for a new refactoring, he&#039;ll start to get addicted. And when a series of simple refactorings create an opportunity to easily add behaviour/fix bugs (that have been pending as too difficult), you&#039;re done.

It may be a long road, but what do you have to lose? If not anything else, you can keep on doing what you know to help yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should just keep on doing what you do, preferably pairing with your colleagues. If none of them will eventually get it, then the problem is not the &#8220;how&#8221; you are showing them, it&#8217;s the &#8220;what&#8221;, and there is nothing that can be done to help them.</p>
<p>The first level are the &#8220;trivial&#8221; refactorings that simply save (a lot of) keystrokes. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s difficult for them to appreciate them. But when someone sees a simple refactoring create an opportunity for a new refactoring, he&#8217;ll start to get addicted. And when a series of simple refactorings create an opportunity to easily add behaviour/fix bugs (that have been pending as too difficult), you&#8217;re done.</p>
<p>It may be a long road, but what do you have to lose? If not anything else, you can keep on doing what you know to help yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

